Saturday 22 July 2017

the dreariest rationalism





THOUGHTS 

on 

CHIEF EPISCOPAL OFFICERS, 

BLOODY BIG RODENTS, 

and the 

FUTURE of the DANCE


(in three parts to save your sanity).

PART TWO:


The Dreariest Rationalism

 [To recapitulate, where we left off ...
 

So: deacons, priests and CEOs? Apprentices, sub-branch managers, RMCs, ADs, RDs and CEOs? Phew. Now we’ve sorted that out and ciboria and piscine are in their rightful place in the rubbish dump of history, this strange beast called Church, Anglophile branch,[1] should burst at the seams. Okay?]


Except Merton again. “It seems to me that the best of Anglicanism is unexcelled, but that there are few who have the refinement in spirit to see and embrace the best, and so many who fall off into the dreariest rationalism.”[2] What was this mad ’merican monk on,[3] or on about? While this, from a Roman Catholic, reveals hints of the doctrine of “salvation by good taste” that I have heard one colleague parody Anglicanism as, it does critique the slow sad slide of a glorious conduit of mystery into dull pragmatism. I doubt the zany Dylan-loving monk was applauding Anglican penchants for obscurantism, but rather its ability to convey divine mystery – and the converse, lamenting its 1960s proclivity to strip bare possibilities of divinity, still apparent in Aotearoa Branch as a tendency to resemble the Labour or Green Party at Prayer.


So, given that Merton was to some extent an outsider, and to most extents a prophet, was he issuing a warning that has fallen on mainly deaf ears? Another devotee of Merton, incidentally, was that other mad prophet, James K. Baxter. He noted of Merton, “his books went out, into the world, knocking at every door, saying: ‘Mourn and rejoice! Your respectability is no use to you any longer. It can’t hide you from God. It never did; you only thought it did. Come out and meet your Lover.’”[4] It seems there are critics of a doctrine of salvation by good taste. But I suspect that, at the same time, Merton and Baxter alike would decry that other emerging heresy, salvation by executive order.


For, buried in the obscurity of rite and ritual, sometimes abused but sometimes a vehicle of unspeakable mystery, is something important. There dwells there some impishness, some playfulness, some exotic craziness that perhaps could convey eternity, could convey Om, could convey an Omega point or a nirvana beyond the mundanity of those trials and tribulations, Shakespeare’s “slings and arrows or misfortune” that dog us “all the day long of this troublous life”. Certainly it could do so with more accomplishment than the language and structure of a suburban sub-branch, the “respectability” that Baxter loathed and that is strangling still the lifeblood from God’s crazy people.


All the while the slow strangulation was aided, abetted and I suspect master-minded by purple shirted and purple-aspirant CEO- and AD- and RMC-types, as they breathily chased administrative and theological mundanity, respectability, banality. Because as it happens, though they weren’t heavily into genuflection,  they so  horizontalized the mysteries of the Church’s core business of worship  that ironically they were prostrate, worshipping faded middle-classness in the service of something called “relevance,” “the dreariest rationalism.” 


Baxter’s Holy Spirit famously squawked and laid an egg[5] and the Incarnate Baby slid silently down the bathwater’s ecclesiastical gurgler (too dull and prosaic to ever be a piscina) and slid past glaring gate-keepers, out the door, into city streets and bars. “Come out and meet your Lover.”


Ah, the gate-keepers! The psalmist saw them long ago: “I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a green bay tree.” They are still there for now, at the door, keeping seekers out and the submissive in. Burnt-out clingers to past dreams, aesthetes whose version of good taste, often paradoxically prosaic, is the apotheosis of aspiration. That’s not the way we do it here, which means “that’s not the way we did it as Mother Ecclesia died around our ears, but we’re still here.” The purple-shirted and their acolytes often love them, because: deep pockets. Because compliance.

Because boat-unrocking stagnant dreariness. 


So where now, Mother Ecclessia?


Will o’ the wisps, or in Latin “ignes fatui,”were considered dangerous things, leading the vulnerable to sticky ends. Fire of fools. But perhaps there is a clue there? Fools for Christ perhaps?[6] Perhaps where Mother Ecclesia has become the hoax that Merton feared is where it became afraid to be foolish. 


We are called to a dance of fools. Out where the ignes fatui dance. Out beyond the stern, glum gate-keepers of propriety and dignity. Out where the dance is undignified, crazy, holy.


Merton fought against this out, trying to stay on board, trying to hint from within at the possibility of a dance, a holy manic largesse of spirit. He tried to persuade his gatekeepers of a mad manic faith so bizarre (yet, ironically, so disciplined) that he dare liken it to a tab of LSD. Oh to have faith that might be likened to the outplay of a tab of LSD! Oh to have joy that might suggest drunkenness at nine o’clock in the morning!


I once experienced a bum acid (LSD) trip. For umpteen hours I was trapped in a body that was being strangled from within, strangled by the God I did not believe in. Perhaps it was prescient. Since then I have also experienced life trapped inside a body of faux-­Christ. Trapped where the lights are going out, trapped and soul-strangled from within by a small g- imposter-god, a faux-god called “how we’ve always done it,” and “how it’s safe to do it” and strangely, because faux-gods will always shape-shift, actually a god called “how the ticket collector did it” and “how the auditor did it” and a myriad other invitations to a living death.


Yet, just beyond the hunched shoulders and glowering visage of that faux-God, beyond the glaring gate-keepers and their stern visages sneering in cold contempt, do I see ignes fatui, dancing on the marsh, threatening to lead journeyers to their death?


Not leading though, to the death of hope. Not leading to the desperate death of the respectable, to the dreary rationalist death of the already lifeless. Not beckoning the banal, prosaic pragmatism of a club-church in which croziers became iPhones and piscinae became gurglers, the club-congregation of the already-dead. Leading to a holy death.
  
That body of banality is an imposter. Its death knows no hope: abandon hope, all ye who enter. CEOs going down out of habit more than courage, followed by their acolytes with extinguished candles, trudging together in a self-inflicted death, death without dance. “I had not thought death had undone so many,” wrote Dante, and it is undoing many more, trudging, trudging. Grossman wrote of the darkest of deaths: “immediately behind Viktor, right at his heels, followed doubt, suffering, lack of belief,” and then bleakly, “we will have vanished – just as the Aztecs once vanished.”

[More later ... because after Good Friday comes Easter]


[1] Because here in the antipodes we don’t like to think “English”, though sometimes we skip the Angles and Saxons and claim the Celts.
[2] Merton, to Donald Allchin, April 25th 1964. Reprinted in Furlong, Merton, 274.
[3] In a tongue-in-cheek letter to a friend Merton suggested the latter send “a barrel of LSD” along with some Bob Dylan records. I am informed a “barrel” was slang for a mere tab, but Merton’s humour was terribly risqué and with that sort of impishness he could never have been an Anglican, I’m sure. Merton, to Edward Rice, July 20th 1964. Cited in Furlong, Merton, 296.
[4] James K. Baxter, Complete Prose (Volume 3. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2015), 38. 
[5] James K. Baxter, “Ode to Auckland”, Collected Poems (Wellington: Oxford University Press, 1979), 598.
[6] For those who feel that foolishness belongs outside the hallowed grounds or faith, 1 Cor 4.10 and surrounds makes interesting reading.

No comments:

Post a Comment